THIS WAS ALL DONE IN ORDER TO ENABLE EVENTS LIKE 9-11 PEOPLE! TO FUND MURDER OF US AND PEOPLE LIKE US THROUGH OUR OWN COMPASSION FOR OPPRESSED CHILDREN. I AM SICKENED TO HEAR "HER" DEFENDED. ALL OF THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE SIMPLY BY KNOWING HIS NAME:
ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI
ANY ONE OF YOU COULD FIND ALL OF IT ON THE INTERNET.
HE PUT EVERY ABILITY OF A HIGHLY TRAINED EXTREMELY INTELLIGENT BEHAVIORIST INTO MAKING YOU ALL LOVE "JANET"
THE TERRORIST WOULD BE THRILLED TO SEE HIS CALCULATED CONNDITIONING AND BRAIN WASHING WAS SO EFFECTIVE.
Time for a little perspective people. We are talking about an expert behaviorist here. He was recorded and investigated in a year long operation by the FBI. They had undercover agents posing as terrorist sympathizers wishing to fund terrorist efforts. They had undercover agents posing as terrorist operatives affiliated with terrorist training camps. He was recorded extensively brokering the contribution of funds to the terrorist camps. He completed the false transaction set up by the FBI. None of this is speculation, all a matter of pubic record. He has had various bogus fund raising fronts since at least 2003, claiming to be raising money for compassionate and conservative charities. He used the ID "Iohagh" at other web sites before "Janet" was a member here. The posts under that ID can be found on Cnet.com, and Talkback. just by searching "Iohagh" on Google. He used the name IDpixie for his corporation well before "janet" was a member here. The Cnet posts do not make any reference to "Janet McCall" until well after "she" was a member here and had begun her so called campaign to end child slavery. Then he began signing a few that way to cover his use of that ID with his own distinctive voice. The topics discussed were voiced with a high level of expertise in the field which he used as his public business. IDentity protection during credit card transactions on the internet. There is no trace of "Janet's" feminine persona in those posts at all. He was arrested on February 17th during which time it was presented to people on AP that he and Janet were supposedly together. No mention has been made of anyone being with him when he was arrested, "Janet" has not been heard from since his arrest.
In this post by Iohagh,
http://allpoetry.com/poem/2561264
where she speaks of her week of "behaviorist training" "she" says:
*************
"Then, when the facilitator talked she revealed stuff to us that seemed like magic. How could she know that I kept thinking so I asked it. She looked at me like silly girl and said, "Your body and reactions are clearly telling me everything I need to know since your character responds exactly as the chart says." So I looked at the chart and lo and behold. Every action I did was just as my character was written. It was worse than astrology because it was too exact. So I said how many people can see through you like this. The trainer said, well, your uncle for one since his company trained me ten years ago. "
***********
A person with this expertise could come across as any personality or gender they wished. Why create a different persona? Because he was a Middle aged Muslim businessman in New York City, who had previously been investigated for fund raising fraud involving his former business GlobalProtector.net. The likelihood that he could illicit trust and raise enough interest and involvement to raise money on a large scale with his own identity was highly unlikely.
A young extremely likable female sympathetic character, who has displayed excellent business acumen through her ownership of two businesses, who has started a group to mentor kids called "Pixieland" however could gain much support.
There is no record of anyone by the name of "Janet McCall" having ever appeared before the UN for any purpose, let alone to read poetry as "she" presented to us that she did.
Link to the indictment:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/site-resources/images/11035687.pdf
The Indictment:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : INDICTMENT
-v.- : 07 Cr.
ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, :
a/k/a "Michael Mixon,"
:
Defendant.
:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
COUNT ONE
(Financing Terrorism)
The Grand Jury charges:
1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and
including in or about December 2006, in the Southern District of
New York and elsewhere, ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, a/k/a
"Michael Mixon," the defendant, and others known and unknown,
where the offense did take place in the United States and was
directed toward the carrying out of a predicate act outside the
United States, and within the United States, the offense and the
predicate act were conducted in, and the results thereof
affected, interstate and foreign commerce, unlawfully, willfully,
and knowingly, directly and indirectly did attempt to provide and
collect funds with the intention that such funds be used, and
with the knowledge that such funds were to be used, in full and
in part, in order to carry out an act intended to cause death and
serious bodily injury to a civilian, and to any other person not
2
taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed
conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature and
context, was to intimidate a population, and to compel a
government and an international organization to do and to abstain
from doing any act, to wit, ALISHTARI, in exchange for payment,
transferred and concealed the transfer of approximately $152,000
in funds that he believed were being sent to Pakistan and
Afghanistan to be used to support a terrorist training camp in
Afghanistan by, among other things, funding the purchase of
equipment such as nightvision goggles.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2339C & 2.)
COUNT TWO
(Material Support of Terrorism)
The Grand Jury further charges:
2. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and
including in or about December 2006, in the Southern District of
New York and elsewhere, ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, a/k/a
"Michael Mixon," the defendant, and others known and unknown,
unlawfully and knowingly did attempt to provide "material support
or resources," as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b),
namely, currency, monetary instruments, financial securities,
financial services, and expert advice or assistance, and conceal
and disguise the nature, location, source, and ownership of
3
material support or resources, knowing that they were to be used
in preparation for, and in carrying out, a violation of an
offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), to wit, financing
terrorism, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, to wit, ALISHTARI,
in exchange for payment, attempted to transfer and conceal the
transfer of approximately $152,000 in funds that he believed were
being sent to Pakistan and Afghanistan to be used to support a
terrorist training camp in Afghanistan by, among other things,
funding the purchase of equipment such as nightvision goggles.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2339A & 2.)
COUNT THREE
(Money Laundering)
The Grand Jury further charges:
3. On or about August 17, 2006, in the Southern
District of New York and elsewhere, ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI
ALISHTARI, a/k/a "Michael Mixon," the defendant, in an offense
involving and affecting interstate and foreign commerce,
unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly did transport, transmit, and
transfer, and attempt to transport, transmit, and transfer,
monetary instruments and funds from a place in the United States
to and through a place outside the United States, to wit,
ALISHTARI caused the transfer of approximately $25,000 from a
bank account in New York to a bank account in Montreal, Canada,
4
with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful
activity, to wit, providing material support to terrorists in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339A.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a)(2)(A) and 2.)
COUNT FOUR
(Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
The Grand Jury further charges:
4. From at least in or about 1998, up to and
including in or about 2004, in the Southern District of New York
and elsewhere, ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, a/k/a "Michael
Mixon," the defendant, and others known and unknown, unlawfully,
willfully, and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and
agree together and with each other to commit offenses against the
United States, to wit, to violate Section 1343 of Title 18,
United States Code.
5. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that
ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, a/k/a "Michael Mixon," the
defendant, and others known and unknown, unlawfully, willfully
and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme
and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by
means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and
promises, would and did transmit and cause to be transmitted by
means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate
5
and foreign commerce, a writing, sign, signal, picture and sound
for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, to wit,
ALISHTARI administered and promoted a fraudulent loan investment
program known as the "Flat Electronic Data Interchange" ("FEDI")
through which ALISHTARI and others fraudulently obtained millions
of dollars in investments from various individuals by falsely
promising high, guaranteed rates of return, in violation of Title
18, United States Code, Section 1343.
(Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.)
COUNT FIVE
(Wire Fraud)
The Grand Jury further charges:
6. From in or about 1998, up to and including in or
about 2004, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere,
ABDUL TAWALA IBN ALI ALISHTARI, a/k/a "Michael Mixon," the
defendant, having devised and intending to devise a scheme and
artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by
means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and
promises, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly did transmit and
cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in
interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals and
sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, to
wit, ALISHTARI administered and promoted a fraudulent loan
6
investment program known as FEDI through which ALISHTARI and
others fraudulently obtained millions of dollars in investments
from various individuals by falsely promising high, guaranteed
rates of return.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.)
_________________________ _________________________
FOREPERSON MICHAEL J. GARCIA
United States Attorney
LOOK FOR YOURSELVES
GOOGLE SEARCH LINK FOR
Abdul Tawala ibn Ali Alishtari
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Abdul+Tawala+ibn+Ali+Alishtari&btnG=Google+Search
GOOGLE SEARCH LINK FOR
Iohagh
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Iohagh&btnG=Search
GOOGLE SEARCH LINK FOR
IDPixie
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=IDPixie+LLC&btnG=Search
Talk Back posts from cnet.com news
hmmmm Janet or Abdul? It's Jabdulnet!
Emperor Nero made a mistake and we are doing the same thing.
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 4:14 PM PST
Story: Homeland Security wraps up first mock cyberattack
I understand practice makes perfect however logic should say do not practice in the middle of a fire. Put the fire out first...
While the rest of the world implements solutions doing 4 part authentication using multiple interactive solutions leading to a single use credit or debit use number, we play games knowing the US patented the solution years ago.
Nero had nothing on us. At least he got the joy of inspiration but remember he was hunted down like a rabid dog by his own gaurds and died begging for his life.
Virtual Product Announcements Are Vaporware
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: March 4, 2006, 6:04 PM PST
Story: What's behind open-source ID push?
It seems the duopoly of IBM and its guys and MSN and its guys are in a war of words or vaporware propaganda that basically is about the emporers in this case, both, being without clothes. No patented technology, no timeline, just good press by dubious means which is having good writers write about other writers specualations.
Simply put, the solution to the marketplace isn't coming from MSN due to trust restrictions and not from IBM and crew because they are like mice who are too fat to get away from the cat down the hole.
The marketplace is ready and it will take a lot to stop what is coming, a real solution by a real credible player that serves the wholesale market but put its product universally in the hands of the consumer who doesn't trust anyone else anyway.
Big brother failed, banks fail, Visa failed, Amex failed, MasterCard and all the security companies failed however the FFIEC says solve it so it will be solved because that is a virtual franchise waiting for a real patented solution that works.
Security Conundrum
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 26, 2006, 9:17 AM PST
Story: Microsoft looks for 'protection' money
The problem here is they brought the wrong security. MSN should be focusing on keeping data offline, a simple procedure, and just license whomever owns it. Duh. A clear home run but it seems common sense is becoming less common as conglomerates act like ancient money trusts and less like what made them rich in the first place: innovation and solving problems.
Why it is safe gives us something to think about
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 28, 2006, 8:28 PM PST
Story: Is Mac OS as safe as ever?
Mac is safer because each new computer is set on a different platform that can be interrelated but which hackers despise learning something that will be obsolete in a couple of years.
Why bother when most people are using PC's with MSN and therefore they let the nuts as they see them continue on their merry way.
Will they get to Macs eventually sure they will once an offline ID processing system is ready for PCs then they'll have to go where the arrogance and myth is strong that people are protected online.
This only increases the need for a universal platform solution to keep all ID offline.
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: September 7, 2006, 9:26 PM PDT
Story: Credit card companies form security council
Dear Credit Card Industry
Its about time since I have been monitoring this security issue for awhile and the government FFIEC needs help from the industy which is what it has been requesting all along. It sets guidelines but then expects the industry to change without specific direction left or right.
Anyway, the ID theft charge card platform for all cards has to be outside the charge card industry with a third party agency which has the solution so that all the competing platforms have a level playing field.
The consumers, remember us, we cannot beat the cyber thieves while the card serving platforms are simultaneously fighting amongst ourselves.
Therefore, the card platforms working together gives that third party agency a step up whomever they may be.
Billions in Crime Need A Fast Block
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: January 26, 2006, 1:50 PM PST
Story: Computer crime costs $67 billion, FBI says
I hear that there is a patent on Single Use Credit Card Number ID in the USA and whomever uses that is going to really grow fast if they have the right marketing plan in the US because the US FFIEC is by fiat requiring that everyone use 4 factor authentication that leads to that product, a single use ID either in tokens or in offline devices. Basically the time is now and we the consumers are watching.
Protecting Democracy
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 2:27 PM PST
Story: Voter databases must be secured, report says
I think the same Federally mandated technology that protects our depositors accounts could be used. That is four factor authentication with offline voting ID readers to bring privacy and accuracy to us.
You cannot fool the people 100% of the time
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 11:02 PM PST
Story: Consumer distrust could lash e-commerce
You cannot fool the people 100% of the time
The IT Security giants have had a good run to be naked and have no clothes on. Like the proverbial Emporer they talk that talk but its getting cool out behind because they have no security in house that truly meets FFIEC standards and they know it.
The government keeps asking politely is the IT Security Industry ready and the industry says we are almost got an answer but no prize.
Try almost breathing or almost being married. I almost caught a thief is unacceptable if you have the technology that the U.S. has.
In addition, one thing is certain. The IT Security Kings are all naked without clothes. I am not bowing before naked gentlemen who are supposed to be all that.
Sometimes I think the world is insane because stupidity like this prevails.
Logic says the Feds should know not ponder and wonder
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 1:59 PM PST
Story: Homeland Security official suggests outlawing rootkits
Maybe guns in the hands of kids should be illegal. Well, its not illegal as much as it is illegal to sell it to them without a legal license which they cannot get until they are adults.
I am amazed that basic stuff that any common sense solution could solve is lost here. For my part, I look at this as just another keystroke cops, sic, keystone cops.
The problem is it isn't funny because as a taxpayer I'm paying for it.
RSA is the early leader before the 2006 security shakeout
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 14, 2006, 8:19 AM PST
Story: RSA turns everyday gadgets into security tokens
RSA is the early leader before the 2006 security shakeout
RSA is touted as the be all and end all of US online security companies and its product line is impressive I might say in advance.
RSA bought Cyota that failed to bring to market the single use credit card number that was patented by inventor, Mr. Jeffrey Ice.
RSA does not have within its impressive IP armory all or even some of the best solutions to security in the marketplace.
This year 2006 will decide whom is whom in this security marketplace.
I am concerned
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 26, 2006, 8:57 AM PST
Story: FTC settles with CardSystems over data breach
I am concerned that after the settlement that people whose ID's are still out there have no or little recourse.
I think the US should be suing for a superfund to cover the leakage since companies will pay millions and say oops and don't care.
Who is checking that the whistle blower is clean
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: April 1, 2006, 4:12 PM PST
Story: Neighborhood watch for phishing launches
A year ago on the Internet, I read an FBI report on how cyber scammers turned on each other to prove they were good guys as in fact they were merely two doors to the same house of abuse.
Lets say I was about to use an ATM machine and someone said the one over there has been compromised showing me he reported it. I might at first say thanks and then ask him which ones are OK. Ahh there's the trick online.
Crooks can spoof the site of a government agency and create a false sense of trust.
How do I know you are just a good citizen and not someone trying to trick me into trusting you. Yes people should participate but on a reportage level to official or industry reporting authorities but there has to be cross checking since vigilantes are often crooks in disguise.
Or worse, there is a safe door and they advertise by false reportage that the safe door is unsafe keeping people vulnerable to their attacks.
Basically, the day of the Minuteman who heard a horn or a call and ran to the common defense is over. However, the history like in Switzerland where every house is armed is a better metaphor.
If people have a technology or a solution that relies upon their compliance and keeping their PINs and code secrets then that would be perfect wouldn't it.
Keep private bank data offline or just hand criminals the key
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 17, 2006, 9:18 PM PST
Story: New Trojans plunder bank accounts
Trojans can only steal what they can see so the answer seems to be keep private bank data offline or just hand cyber mafias the key to the the vault.
Now getting to that point and working backwards is more logical than trying to fight robots, zombies and infrastructures that are already compromised.
On your SOS about ID theft in banks and law makers
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 18, 2006, 11:58 AM PST
Story: Senate moves toward new data security rules
I cannot agree with you more however this means we voters have to tell our legislators like they did in UK that we want stiff fines and implementation of not only 4 factor authentication that produces single use credit card numbers but the numbers themselves.
BOFA cancels numerous debit cards
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 10, 2006, 7:31 AM PST
Story: Bank of America cancels numerous debit cards
No beef no deal.
I think it is about time that banks like Bank of America start thinking about a platform solution that keeps ID offline rather than playing with flawed software, toys or gadgets that haven't been proven.
Everyone knows four level authentication with offline devices is mandated or fiated by the FFIEC and the result of all those relationships is users will benefit from single use credit card numbers that are kept offline.
So, wake up and do that because otherwise people like me are going to ask "Where's the Beef".
The patent has been given just do the right thing within the Federal time limit and the winner will end up being the biggest most reputable bank.
Saying you are giving me my money back after theft is like saying you are going to definitely repay me for bank rape.
Well, here's a clue guys, you invade my account and I'm gone because I cannot trust your promises anymore. So, whomever gets their act together, that's who I'm marrying my money with respectively.
I'm not mad just fed up and I am not taking all this double talk anymore.
Is the FBI able?
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 1:44 PM PST
Story: FBI wants your help to fight cybercrime
In recent days, Bill Gates openly satirizes the VP and the US Presidency as incompetent, Google says no to the Justice Department on constitutional grounds of protecting citizen's rights and the IT Security industry knows it doesn't have as yet a solution though patents abound aplenty that would require them losing money and status to serve the US marketplace.
What is going on? I think profit has taken the place of patriotism. I was watching the history channel and it talked about all the Presidents and then it said President Theodore Roosevelt felt an unrestricted private market of billionaires was a threat to public safety so he championed anti-trust and anti-monopolist laws.
People seeing him do that then put into effect legislation on an unrestricted Presidency.
Now, all checks and balances are off. Small industry has the solution but big industry says screw the consumer and the Government instead of paving a way for consumer protection weakly sets standards that might work but need interpretation giving the big business a way to weasle out of serving the consumer.
Then, the FBI says, more or less, we cannot protect the consumer why don't you guys, the industry that has no profit motive to do so do it for us and help us also catch the bad guys.
OK, here's a news flash. The bad guys are using software created by the good guys but the good guys act like, hey, so what, we cannot be responsible for what someone does to our stuff. I heard this before with gun makers who say guns don't kill people, bad guys with guns do.
The buck stops somewhere but that aside. It is going to be up to the consumers to pick a product that works and that is the sin here.
We depositors have to protect ourselves and we don't know how to do it since everyone is pointing at each other. I expect my tax dollars to be spent better than that.
I cannot agree more that online servers is like leaving the back door open
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 18, 2006, 11:44 AM PST
Story: DNS servers--an Internet Achilles' heel
TalkBack: DNS servers--an Internet Achilles' heel
Calling the weakness to the system of online DNS servers as having an Achilles Heel is so true.
Imagine how simple it is to just keep private bank data offline or to use a system that acts like a moat where only the user can access the data.
This is possible but it requires think in macro platform micro services where the customer, oh no, is in charge of his security.
No one els has proven to be competant.
Why it is safe gives us something to think about
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 28, 2006, 8:28 PM PST
Story: Is Mac OS as safe as ever?
Mac is safer because each new computer is set on a different platform that can be interrelated but which hackers despise learning something that will be obsolete in a couple of years.
Why bother when most people are using PC's with MSN and therefore they let the nuts as they see them continue on their merry way.
Will they get to Macs eventually sure they will once an offline ID processing system is ready for PCs then they'll have to go where the arrogance and myth is strong that people are protected online.
This only increases the need for a universal platform solution to keep all ID offline.
ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says
Reader post by: A.t. Alishtari
Posted on: August 9, 2005, 9:52 AM PDT
Story: ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says
ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says
Mr. AT Alishtari, POA and Founder EDI Secure LLLP, says the problem is not blowing over. Cyber mafias know their days are numbered since when G8 central banks start licenseing and linking two-factor authentication with offline devices in two years to protect consumers and depositors, their game is up.
The US Commerce Depart NIST level 4 authentication that this company owns a legal US patent to that type of technology will eliminate all ID from theft online by keeping it offline.
There will be nothing for the cyber mafias to steal later on if the G8 plans complete soon so they are getting while the getting is good.
The problem is big banks are like ships fighting submarines without a unified approach. Each bank thinks that it missed the bullet when another bank is hit not knowing that bank is clearing the way for it to also be sunk fast from below.
Software is like depth charges that either hits or misses but our technology using two factor authentication with offline devices is true stealth technology. The cyber mafias cannot hit what they cannot see.
Story:
ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says A.t. Alishtari -- Aug 9 2005, 9:52 AM PDT
Security and Forethought? OneWithTech -- Aug 25 2005, 4:16 AM PDT
It just isn't right. Iohagh -- Feb 18 2006, 11:56 AM PST
It just isn't right. Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 18, 2006, 11:56 AM PST
Story: ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says
I agree with you that some of these companies feel since no one is attempting the solutions that work because they don't own the patent thereto that just placate the consumer. Well I am a consumer and I say lax attitudes today is wrong. It jsut isn't right and later it will come back to bite them in the rear.
Mr. Alishtari's comments are adjusted to the buyout of EDI Secure LLLP Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Ali -- Jan 17 2007, 6:04 AM PST
Justin you are talking my language Iohagh -- Feb 18 2006, 12:27 PM PST
Justin you are talking my language
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 18, 2006, 12:27 PM PST
Story: ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says
I agree "a little preemptive thinking can go a long way!"
The US of A Federal Government must post serious fines for banks allowing security breaches but it must also implement its new FFIEC guidelines that lead to a flawless off line block to crooks stealing our bank private ID at all.
The lost money, lost time, and a lost warm and fuzzy on security by the consumer must be replaced by flawless technology of a security box outside the Internet box to block ID theft.
All I can say is I agree with you and this is the year the change must take place or E-Commerce will lose all consumer confidence.
Stampeding Giants Running Off The IT Cliff
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: March 16, 2006, 12:20 PM PST
Story: Your secret PIN may not be so secret
I imagine in paleolithic times the herd were driven by the predators to kill themselves since the predators knew where the traps were and the herd animals, in this case, dynosaurs, with seeming invincibility to the small predators just obliged their era's cyber crooks by walking or running right off the cliff.
Like the Western American Mustang, wild herds can thrive if they learn to fight back and grow small and fiesty. Bears, lions and man weren't easilly able to do what cold blooded lizards did millions of years ago to the dynosaurs.
Four factor authentication using an offline device like what is patented in the US is that new smaller platform and those giants who don't get it will most likely have their bones viewed in museums like we do now.
An important thing to note is with the dynasaurs died their predators who could not adapt to the more fiesty, smart and impossibly quick next generation of hot blooded herds.
Although, I am sure, if they had survived, they would have made a quick meal of mankind. Thank goodness they didn't.
The fact is the big IT companies dominated by MSN on one side and IBM on the other have become, oh my gosh, Luddites opposing smaller platforms. The duo-opoly cannot control the new ideas and patents since their muscles, cannot call it thought, like stheir fat big boned massess with multiple opportunities for predation.
In addition to that, the predators are thankful for their prediliction.
Lies inside of mysteries inside of misdirection, sounds normal to me.
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 20, 2006, 2:39 PM PST
Story: Banks scramble on debit card theft
Lies inside of mysteries inside of misdirection, sounds normal to me.
There should be a plain speaking law that says what it means and means what it says. Pundits say the laws less protect assets on savings using debit cards and protects more fully credit that isn't anywhere. Shouldn't the assets on deposit as our earnings and income at least get the same protection as credit which is a debt that the governments always reorganize but which we small people cannot do and must suffer. Jeepers creepers.
Security is a field where the bleeding edge is causing many a concern
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 15, 2006, 10:04 PM PST
Story: Security titans weigh in on buyout environment
Security is a field where the bleeding edge is causing many a concern however the USPTO recognizes there are patents out there on locks on PDA's and other systems including single use platforms not presented in public companies or at =conferences where players are generally.
One has to consider what is going on. My thinking is the big players are trying to come up with alternatives to all the patents while buying existing companies that might have sought out real solutions.
The market is an alphabet soup of solutions, me toos and lots of empty claims that companies and banks are buying like what happened with recent banks and companies that thought stopping crime on one letter might protect them on another.
Online, the distance from the front door to the back door is milliseconds if that. Simply someone is going to wake up this year and look not at what the advertising says but at growth in the marketplace since the only two economic realities are income and consumers.
Some one business must break through and that company will be the one to watch and not the ones whose solutions are partial or not patented since everyone else will follow the leader then.
Hello wake up there please.
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: March 16, 2006, 11:50 AM PST
Story: Biometrics unreliable, says EU privacy head
Last August at a conference in Las Vegas as the US and its industry was touting biometrics and wands, guess what, it was widely reported even in the NY Times that a bunch of California IT guys hacked into the system from 800 feet away on the roof of the Casino.
In short, wireless sucks even if it is stuck in your brain or other nether parts. It just doesn't work in a way that cannot be captured by unsophisticated crooks.
our red white and blues are showing
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: February 18, 2006, 12:57 PM PST
Story: House backs Bush on Internet stance
We are bleeding red ink all over the floor and the credit card companies now admit the cyber mafias have them beat and everyone is saying its someone else's fault which is singing the blues.
So we created it but we cannot defend it. We can attack other countries but not defend our money. If your wife had to choose between you keeping your money in your bank account or spending money on propaganday, what would she vote.
Let me put it another way, would you get any sleep? I love the web only because of the good on it but I got to admit it needs policing bad and the Cybercrime Treaty before the Senate admits that it is everyone's problem on enforcement.
The lawmakers cannot even agree what is illegal but the Newsweek July 4th 2005 issue made it simple. Its security OK. If the world is under attack by Russian protected cyber mafias, then it is war. OK only 40% of our accounts are affected.
We should lead and not follow and recognize that whomever invented it, it is attacking everyone now.
What would Reagan Do?
Reader post by: Iohagh
Posted on: May 16, 2006, 1:15 PM PDT
Story: Congress may make ISPs snoop on you
Dear friends,
This is a question my fellow Republicans used to ask instead of fear mongering. I too dislike much of the the salacious and offensive material on the WWW however our representational democracy works. It protects ideals and even ideas the majority doesn't like.
The difference between the ancient Greeks and then Romans whose democracies were an oligarchy of just old male head of households and what we have today in America is the USA protected the rights of the little guy against the big guys even if it meant, well, a less perfect society.
President Reagan often spoke on the virtues of this American system saying we were home grown good guys who fought good wars and showed the rest of the world the best of Western Civilization. Hey, I believe that too.
In this time of crisis where basic freedoms are at risk, maybe someone in charge should sit back and say "What would President Reagan do?". He ended the "Cold War" amicably without a shot or a nuclear boom. I cannot help but think have we lost all that.
Anyway, I vote against the Congress requiring ISP act like big brother because, well, it assumes evil and it violates the presumption of innocence. I don't think the present jingoism has anything to do with Reaganomics and Reaganism.
ID theft ring hits 50 banks, security firm says